WIP II Communications plan (annotated for Jane)

Communications plan - latest version 27.10.15

Comms plan in draft above.  Next stage includes:

  • Breaking down Phase 2 Comms - differences between the faculties for example and how messages may need to be tailored.
  • Discussing the stakeholder map with Nigel and seeing whether this is the sort of thing he wanted.
  • Comms action plan for remainder of 2015 and 2016

Approach

This came from Kim in Comms. I just copied and pasted it into the page, then start the new (attached) document.

COMPONENT

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY THIS?

PROPOSED MODEL

BACKGROUND

What the WIP2 is all about

The WIP2 project is about improving Victoria’s Web channel to make it more modern, flexible, sustainable and user-focused.

Three principles guide the project:

  1. User-centred design – the channel meets the needs, priorities and expectations of its users.
  2. Sustainability – the web channel can be maintained by the University web community to a high standard, and is adaptable to changing technologies.
  3. Accessibility – the web channel is accessible to all users

OBJECTIVE

What we want communications on the WIP2 to achieve

Where relevant, the Victoria community will know about the project, will understand what it is about and what the expected changes will be.

STRATEGY

How we will achieve our objective

Clear communications to specific areas where applicable and to the whole University community when needed.

OUTCOMES

The long-term end goals

Staff across the University know about the project and those who are affected by changes are aware of them and are comfortable with them before they happen.

GOALS

Desired results that we plan to achieve

The WIP2 is successfully rolled out and staff feel they have been consulted about possible changes and that the changes really are improvements.

KEY MESSAGE

What is the message you want people to get

The website improvement project is making the University’s web channels more modern, flexible, sustainable and user-focused.

AUDIENCE/STAKEHOLDERS

Who the strategy intends to influence

Faculties

Schools

Postgraduates

Students

General staff

Web administrators / publishers

CHANNELS

 

Email lists

Victoria News

Yammer

Staff intranet home page

Presentations

Communications Matrix

I started fleshing this out, starting with internal comms first.  Everything else has since been added into the comms plan but at a higher, and more so external level.

Communication Type

Objective of Communication

Medium

Frequency

Audience

Owner

Deliverable

Project Team Meetings

Review status of the project with the team

Review of priorities and progress

Project Manager update

Opportunity for team discussion 

Face to Face

Weekly

Project Team

Project Manager

  • Agenda
  • Meeting Minutes (on Confluence)

Technical Design Meetings/Development meetings

Discuss and develop technical design solutions for the project

Face to Face

As Needed

Web team technical staff

Technical Lead (Nathan Irwin)

  • Agenda
  • Meeting Minutes (on Confluence)

/wiki/spaces/PMO/overview (restricted access)

Report on the status of the project to management.

Face to Face

Fortnightly

PMO

Project Manager

Project Status Reports

Report the status of the project including activities, progress, costs and issues

Escalation and identification of issues across project triangle (budget, scope, time)

Confluence page

Weekly

PMO (for information)

Project Team

Project Manager

  • Project Status Report on Confluence

Project Roles

Pretty self explanatory (smile)

Role

Name

Role and responsibility

Project Sponsor

Madeleine Setchell

Communications and Marketing Director

Project Manager

Jane Young (Unlicensed)

Project Manager

Project Stakeholders

See Stakeholder list

See Stakeholder list  

Developer

Andrew Bredenkamp

 

Designer/Developer 

Joe Lobotka (Unlicensed)

 

Senior Web Writer

Anne Nelson (Unlicensed)

 

Content Specialist 

Sam Motion (Unlicensed)

 

Business Analyst 

Paul Seiler (Unlicensed)