Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Topics and undergrad degree pages

Notes

  • This plan includes mostly success metrics (“It’s working well”) – rather than comparative metrics (“It’s better than before”). This is because the WIP2 work involves a high degree of change, and it will be difficult to usefully compare ‘previous state’ with ‘current state’.
  • Some qualitative metrics have been included. Interviews with users, workshops with internal stakeholders (F&S) and students (COO), and meetings with student advisors have provided significant insights into the ‘current state’ of the Victoria website and user issues; and future feedback from these sources is seen as a legitimate source of information on ‘how it’s going’.

 

Success: quantitative

Google Analytics, by month

Topic page

WhatHow

Findability (to evaluate: concept, design, search)

  1. Master topics
  2. Topics
  3. Individual topic pages

 

Unique visits

Total page views

Engagement (to evaluate: content relevance)

  1. Individual topic pages

 

Time spent on page

Exit rate from page

Bounce rate from page

Pathway (to evaluate: concept, design and content)

  1. Master topics to Topics
  2. Topics to individual topic pages

 

 

 

  1. Individual topic page to undergrad degree page
  2. Individual topic page to ‘secondary links’ (Explore other topics, Study support, Student life)

 

Content drilldown

Users flow

Exit rate from page

Bounce rate from page

 

Content drilldown

Users flow

Exit rate from individual topic page

Bounce rate from individual topic page

 

 

Undergrad degree page

WhatHow

Findability (to evaluate: concept, design, search)

  1. Undergrad degree page

 

Unique visits

Total page views

 

Engagement (to evaluate: content relevance)

  1. Undergrad degree page

 

 

Time spent on page

Exit rate from page

Bounce rate from page

 

Conversions (to evaluate: concept, design and content)

 

From undergrad degree page to primary links:

  1. Talk to us (get help with course planning
  2. Come to an open day or info evening
  3. Apply/enrol

 

From undergrad degree page to secondary links:

  1. other UG degree pages
  2. back to Topics

 

 

 

 

Content drilldown

Users flow (if useful)

 

 

Comparative: qualitative

Topic pages, undergrad degree pages

BeforeAfter
Student advisors report that they get lots of enquiries after secondary students can’t find the information they need on the Vic website.

Student advisors report that they get lots of enquiries from secondary students who have found really useful information on the Vic website and now want help to plan their degree.

 

Sessions with secondary students found that the existing undergrad info on disciplines and degrees was difficult to locate, navigate and understand.

Sessions with secondary students find a high level of satisfaction with the undergrad info on disciplines and degrees.

 

Note that comments from new current students could also be useful.

 

 

Student Experience Improvement Survey


There are many factors contributing to changes in ratings in the Student Experience Improvement Survey. However, vastly improved undergrad discipline and programme information on the Victoria website is likely to be a factor in future ratings improvements for the areas noted below:

Pre-enrolment and enrolment experience

  • I knew how to prepare for life as a university student (2014 = 56%)
  • I am confident that the programme of study I am undertaking is right for me (2014 = 70%)
  • Victoria website (2014 = 82%)

Effectiveness of information sources

  • Victoria website (2014 = 82%)

 


 

  • No labels