Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Faculty Manager

(initial contact)

FacultyContact withStatus
Kristina McGuiness-King (Manager, Student and Academic Services)Humanities and Social SciencesKristina McGuiness-KingDone
 NZSMMark McGann  (Corporate Services Manager) and Paul Altomari  (Academic Manager)Done
Fay Jullian (Manager, Student and Academic Services)Architecture and DesignFay JullianDone
Noeleen Williamson (Manager, Student and Academic Services)EducationNoeleen WilliamsonWednesday 13th at 3pmDone
Claire Williams (Faculty Manager)Victoria Business SchoolClaire Williams and Anne Thomson (Stakeholder Relations Manager)Done
Johan Barnard (Manager, Student and Academic Services)ScienceMegan Sellars (Senior Communications and Marketing Advisor)Done
Alison Munro (Manager, Student and Academic Services)LawAlison Munro, Carol Sorenson (School Manager, Law) and Denise Blackett (Senior Law School Administrator)Done
Suzan Hall (School Manager)EngineeringSuzan Hall and Dale Carnegie (Dean, Engineering)TBA
Theresa Sawicka (Manager Research and FGR)FGRTheresa Sawicka (Manager Research and FGR)Friday 15th at 11am, Prof Peter Whiteford (Dean, FGR), Sue O'Donnell (Manager, Scholarships and PhD Admissions) and Judith Bagley (Senior Administrator)Done

 

Findings

The notes below represent a distillation of these conversations and are recorded here so the wider team can read them and comment/augment:

...

  • Paul met with Alison Munro, Carol Sorenson and Denise Blackett on 12/5/15
  • Faculty and School are tight/on the same page, mostly due to the 1-2-1 relationship.
    • This means working together will be easy, efficient and harmonious.
  • Early on the three participants had an "operation level" or compliance type expectations of WIP (i.e. refresh the content). By the end (I believe) they saw this as a "tactical" opportunity.
    • In turn, this raised issues about resourcing (to support the development of their new site)
  • They remember previous redevelopments, and not always fondly/positively. A lot of experience and knowledge we can tap in to
    • Some of the memories are of things they wanted previously but were told no/it is out of scope. I encouraged them to share all ideas, as this is the "elicitation" stage - Prioritisation comes later.
  • Denise has issues regarding the accessibility of support from the web team, or rather the lack of it (she wants to be listened to). I asked them to share these in the content management session.
  • Pathways to employment are important (due to professional body), as is industry and alumini connections
  • No not see themselves as similar enough to VBS to share a workshop.

 

Education

  • Chrissi and Paul met with Noeleen Williamson on 13/5/15
  • She is on board and prepared for what lies ahead.
  • Knows/appreciates that their content/website is not good (too wordy, confused, inconsistent, etc) and sees WIPII as a good opportunity to clean things up
  • Seems to be a lot of other change (is this "normal"?). For example, two schools will merge before the end of the year, 150 course will be "renumbered", programme options under considerable flux, etc
  • Was unable to find school representatives but will now, after hearing of the importance,  try again
  • Their faculty has different dates than others (longer/shorter periods for whatever reasons) that may need special treatment
  • Even when two schools have merged in to one, the there will be some remnant of the Kura (for research activities for staff and maybe students) that needs a web presence/expression
  • Some staff have strong views (so we encouraged her to invite them, despite her concerns that this might "derail" the workshop).
  • Have school staff (where students do placements) as an audience. Might yet have some unique needs?
  • Growth in PG ETFS, which she attributes to meeting market demand for more flexible programmes and pathways.

 Graduate Research

  • Anne and Paul met Theresa, Peter, Sue and Judith on 15/5/25
  • They believe there content is good/valued, albeit wordy, but ought to be somewhere else (it is only on a Faculty site because that was the only place they were able to put it
  • Their information is suitable to all PG by research, whether this be PhD (covered by their remit) or Masters by thesis (initially requested as their remit but faculties were unwilling to relinquish this).
  • Manage PhD admissions, candidacy and examinations.
  • Audiences are PG students and their supervisors (usually Uni staff but occasionally in centres or institutes)
  • Offer many workshops, "own quite a bit of policy, seems well connected with staff throughout the Uni, etc
  • Make a lot of use of email to communicate and would like to know of other/better alternatives.

 

 

 

New Zealand School of Music

  • Paul met Mark and Paul on 2/6/15
  • Overall, they view WIPII as an opportunity and are open to the possibilities and general direction.
  • Due to their unique circumstances (founded by VUW and Masey, own site, more independent, established on a "faculty-like" structure rather than a school, high outreach focus, etc) they currently have:
    • A brand: That VUW paid quite a bit for and has to decide what they want to do with
    • Their own website: In Squiz but built for them
    • Some unique functionality: For example extensive event functionality
    • Less compatible content structures: Possibly, but not even sure if this matters, given that we are not porting content straight through.
    • Higher need for rich media than some other schools: And have staff/people who do this post-production work
    • Revenue or benefit streams from performances/playing and bequeaths
  • Full extent of the changes (due to merging with FHSS) still being worked through and this process:
    • Creates friction/pain: At times and for some
    • Will inform how NZSM looks post-WIPII
    • Will be "advanced/brought forward" by WIPII