Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

 

Internal dependencies

This section refers to the dependencies between the high level scope (HLS) areas (i.e. in-scope or internal dependencies). Developing an understanding of these should help us know where to begin, or at least what to watch out for as we begin. The aim is to capture the nature, direction and significance of the dependency.

Note that I have parked the HLS area "Other" as all areas have a dependency on this work and this work will draw on insights from all other areas. However, we will try to allow this work to proceed as independently as possible from the other scope areas (that all refer to web site content areas).

 

Below is dependent on left because:Student InformationCourse and Subject InformationPostgraduate InformationResearch Centres, Institutes and ChairsFaculties and Schools
Student Informationn/aNo substantive dependenciesFor information relevant to PG students only, but this is more likely to be  encountered when looking at F&SNo substantive dependenciesNo substantive dependencies
Course and Subject InformationNo substantive dependenciesn/aProbably no substantive dependencies, assuming all course, subject and programme goes in C&S. Seems logical for PG courses and subjects but what about PG programmes?No substantive dependenciesNo substantive dependencies
Postgraduate InformationSmall proportion of SI content likely for PG only, so unsure exactly where it is best locatedProbably no substantive dependencies, assuming all course, subject and programme goes in C&S. Seems logical for PG courses and subjects but what about PG programmes?n/aNo substantive dependenciesNo substantive dependencies
Research Centres, Institutes and ChairsNo substantive dependenciesNo substantive dependenciesNo substantive dependenciesn/aNo substantive dependencies
Faculties and SchoolsReasonable amount of content likely to move from F&S to SISubstantive course information likely to move from F&S to C&SSubstantive amount of content likely to move from F&S to PGReasonable amount of content likely to move from F&S to Researchn/a

 

 

External dependencies

This section refers to the dependencies between WIP II and other initiatives/work drivers that are out of scope for WIP II. Developing an understanding of these should inform our expectations for the rate of progress, help with prioritisation of all team work and be shared back to PMO and up to manage expectations. The aim is more general than for internal, but will give a handle on why dependencies are known

Note that business as usual work might well impact on WIP II in many different way and it is not possible to document them all here.

Applying to all HLS areas

Student Information

  • Learning success (LS) activity is a part of the wider Student information (SI) scope but not all of it. As such, order to deliver on SI we will have to deliver LS but the exact timing of each is not yet decided.
  • In updating the information across all 12 sites in scope for SI some content will be moved to the web sites in LS, some to the staff intranet and some to the "About Us" parts of other pages.

Course and Subject Information

  • CIP and the associated COO will provide components of the course information in scope for C&S.

Postgraduate Information

  • none

Research Centres, Institutes and Chairs

  • Progressing the alternative hosting arrangement would allow a better solution for some of theese entities that will otherwise probably be parked/left as is.

Other

  • Project Xenon has a significant overlap with the HLS "Other"
  • No labels