Course, Subjects and Programmes

Options Summary

Option	Description	Pros	Cons
1	Top slice courses, subjects and programmes. Once complete commence on faculty and school sites.	Adheres to initial view of completing centralised repositories first	Delays work on the faculty and school sites
2	Top slice courses and subjects. Programmes done with faculty and school sites.	Adheres to initial view of completing centralised repositories first Move onto F&S sites earlier as programmes are addressed in this development
3	One faculty at a time, with their CSP first.	Each faculty and school site is completed and released as a whole Still addresses CSP first, but focuses on priority faculties upfront	Slows engagement across faculties
4	Two parallel work streams. CSP in one, and F&S sites in another.	Allows progress on F&S sites and CSP in parallel Improves engagement across all faculties, as will work with them sooner on CSP

Option 1 & 2

Top slice each faculty and do entirety of CSP prior to commencing development on the broader F&S site.
Top slice but for courses and subject only. Do programmes as part of the wider F&S site.

Option 3

Do one faculty at a time. Start with CSP. Once completed commence development on the broader F&S site.

Option 4

Top slice faculty 1, starting with CSP. Once completed commence development on the broader F&S site. In parallel to commencing F&S site development, top slice faculty 2 CSP. Continue to top slice across all faculties (and schools), one at a time.