This page is to propose the process (steps) to get subject groupings approved and ready for implementation.
| Step | Notes | Status |
|---|---|---|
Analyse Treejack (user testing) results, identifying where users had difficulty finding the required subjects. Devise changes to address these issues | Sam and Paul mostly, although anyone can have a say | PS has done his part |
Refine groupings and labels based on the findings from the step above. | Sam and Paul mostly, although anyone can have a say. Document changes and reasons in case we are asked (and to reconcile our consultation proposal with the Treejack version) | |
| Prepare "pitch" for meeting with F&S, this being the overall objectives (the rationale for why/how we have grouped), the process followed to date, and the results from the user testing. | This will involve (at least) Sam, Anne, Jo, Jane and Paul. Ensure Nigel is aware/up to date. Where to we involve 'Tash? | |
| Consult with F&S, in priority order, starting with FHSS and FAD (assuming these are the first faculties we will work with) | Expect changes in (but not limited to) the following categories: Mistakes or omissions we have made; 2016 changes we were unaware of; changes based on domain/study knowledge we do not have; preferences/opinions, etc | |
| Negotiate agreement on as many of the suggested changes as is possible in the meeting, both the changes we will adopt ("easy wins") and those the requester withdraws (based on our perspective). | ||
| Document all remaining or unresolved change requests. | ||
| Retire to consider/deliberate the where to next. | Discuss with team for new perspectives. We might need to test all/most of them, given that there is essentially a disagreement. | |
| Second meeting (or communication) with F&S to resolve all outstanding change requests. | ||
| Take proposal to CSP Reference Group for guidance. | ||
| Take proposal to PMO for decision. |