Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Priorities of each delivery

Delivery 1: New taxonomy and current content

  1. UG & PG: Deliver revised taxonomy of topics for navigation purposes, and link to current subject pages. (M)

Delivery 2: Priority content for topics and UG programmes 

  1. UG & PG: Write topic content for 'subjects/specialisations' section. (M)
  2. UG & PG: Write topic content for 'about' section. (M)
  3. UG & PG: Write topic content for 'careers - informational text' section. (M)
  4. UG: Write programme content for 'general' section. (M)

Delivery 3: PG programme pages

  1. PG: Write programme content for 'general' section. (M) - assuming the same as the UG degree page structure?

Remaining deliverables: Lower priority content

  1. UG & PG: Write topic content for 'careers -media items' (C)
  2. UG & PG: Write topic content for 'people and stories' (C)
  3. UG & PG: Write programmes content for 'testimonials' (C)
  4. UG & PG: Write topic content for 'careers -fun facts' (W)
  5. PG: Write any remaining PG programmes content. (tbc)

Approach from meeting with Paul, Joe, Nathan, Tash and David

MUST

SHOULD

  • Metadata for subjects
  • Use images for topics (see wireframe)

COULD

  • Filter UG and PG topics and subjects for UG and PG pages in study

Resource

Timeframe & plan

  • Deadline of Oct 1st
  • Andrew and Paul's work to commence in sprint 19
  • Joe to pick up UI development around COO work at the end of sprint 19/start of sprint 20
  • Plan to follow

Risks/Implications

  • Sign off from key stakeholders on delivery
  • Other implications of release timings i.e. with student recruitment
  • Groupings will not align with any university publications
  • Other project work impacting delivery i.e. COO time for Joe
  • Other unplanned working impacting delivery
  • If not delivered before 1st Oct may have to wait until after Tri 1 enrolment
  • Metadata would need to be signed off by faculties and schools
  • Images used may need to be signed off by F&S's - noting that topics do not break down into singular areas so there would be overlap of sign off
  • Topics and subjects will not be filtered down into UG and PG for those pages in study, however the subjects are not currently filtered on the UG page e.g. Nursing, Midwifery and Health
  • If we need need to filter UG and PG topics and subjects, the tagging solution would need to be in place
  • Added by Paul: Line calls to be made on where PG subjects map to if no subject page (probably the programme) and whether we have two links for subjects that are both UG and PG

Consultation/sign off

  • Review with Nigel
  • Present to Mads (tbc if via PMO)
  • Document all consultation to date with F&S's
  • Review with PVC's with Mads
  • Present to Faculty Managers

 

  • No labels