Proposed order | Project phase | Content area | Current location(s) | Proposed location(s)
| Delivery approach (to move from current to proposed) | Implications | Dependencies | Risks (or in risk register) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Phase 2 | Topics (and associated subjects) | Subjects exist on faculty sites, school sites, Future Students and Victoria International (VI). They are likely to be the same page/content, with "one asset ID".
. | Future Students (until renamed Study at Victoria). Will pull through the VI | Either
|
| Enabling new topic pages with the matching UG programme page seems to be the most sensible approach, in that it delivers returns early, minimises the risk of a big go-live and allows us to learn and tailor our approach as we go Subjects that are PG only could be mapped to existing programme pages, until we are able to rewrite them.
| (No matter how much we try) We will fail to identify all the links that we break when turning old pages off. So long as we fix them promptly when we find them (ideally via a pro-active tool search but at least when reported) it should be okay. Reputation/image during the transition period: Some subjects are covered by new topic pages while others are still on old subject pages. Faculties willingness to have the new-old version split live at the same time. Easier to manage when a faculty has a tight offering but difficult for the broad ones. |
2 | Phase 2 | Undergraduate degree pages | UG degrees exist on faculty sites, school sites, Future Students and VI. They are likely to be the same page/content, with "one asset ID". | Future Students (until renamed Study at Victoria). Will pull through the VI. | 'Remove' UG programme pages when new UG degree pages go live, which in turn is best linked to then the feeder topic pages go live (see row 1 above) | See above | See above Further, it is unlikely that we can "remove" old subject pages until we have enabled the new programme pages, as the subject page currently has the appropriate major rules. So, our rewrite of the programme page is not only to "refresh" the content but also to integrate all the major rules that are currently on the subject pages but will not make it through to the new topic pages. Ideally, all courses would have outlines published via COO. We should map to the course finder result, even knowing that it is only a subset of attributes available on an outline.
| |
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | Implication of COO on f&s: Need page/space for outlines until COO is fully operational. | |||||||
8 | ||||||||
9 |
General
Content
Integrations