Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

With WIP-II course requirements mostly coming from, and being delivered through, COO the focus is now on subjects. This page (and it's children) are to document our analysis around subjects (whereas the analysis of courses is mostly in the COO workspace). 

 

Authoritative sources

The initial discovery identified two authoritative sources as contenders for our master list of subjects (note that this is distinct from the content about subjects). They are the:

  • Web subject listing: An index of subject pages on our website
  • Publications: Subjects are listed in many of our publications (sometimes split in to undergraduate and postgraduate)

 

 

  • Based around "explaining course codes", or at least the first four (alpha) characters.
    • Organised alphabetically by code to support the above purpose, but creating challenges finding an entry if you have a subject in mind.
  • Historic, as in set at a point in time and slow to change. For evidence of this note the modern subjects that do not have a code (e.g.

 

  • "Rationalise" the subject listing for a web/online purpose.
  • No labels