...
The main direction for improvement lies in pruning content areas off all the existing faculty and school sites. This would be done by repeat "by content area" sweeps , and rewriting the content for the Homesite, all prior to redeveloping the first new faculty site. This pruning, at least in part, will cover content that would otherwise be in a future stage, but where doing it earlier seems to make more sense. Each Each sweep would reduce the size and complexity of all the faculty and school sites, so that eventually the only content left is that which will be covered on the new site or dropped altogether. The project team all believe that this revised approach is better, as does Nathan. However, this
This leaves some important questions that need answers before an approach decision can be made.
...
There are currently three areas (in in contention for also being addressed "by content area" before we start on building the first new faculty site. These are in common to all/most faculties, have a significant volume of content (i.e. number of pages), with clear target areas on Homesite) in contention for also being addressed "by content area" before we start on building the first new faculty site:.
- Postgraduate: Programmes (subjects will be done in Phase 2), information, forms, etc on faculty and schools sites, but excluding FGR.
- Excluding Subjects which will be done in Phase 2 and FGR's faculty site and postgraduateLife,
- which will be handled in Phase 3.
- Research: Information for, on and about research (including funding, etc) that is currently in faculty and school sites, but excluding .
- Excluding the research centres, institutes and chairs,
- which will be handled in Phase 4.
- Information to support current students: That information that is in common to other faculties and/or has a natural home in the Current Students zone hub on Homesite, but excluding .
- Excluding current student information that is unique to a faculty and/or does not have a natural home in Current Students (until more work here is done, be that I/A or refactoring).
- Excluding current student information that is unique to a faculty and/or does not have a natural home in Current Students (until more work here is done, be that I/A or refactoring).
All other content on faculty and school sites will be dealt with on a "by faculty" basis.
...
The project team members and Nathan are in agreement to attempt and prune off as much as possible from all the existing faculty sites before engaging with building a new site for the first faculty.
Some guidelines and limits to this view are:
...
We have not seen any content that we would want to move "as is" but accept that we will move "out of scope" content (e.g. short courses) without any changes. So yes, but only due to scope nit because the quality is good enough.
Other questions from Chrissi awaiting answers:
- What impact will it have on the testing required and how will it influence the remaining test plan
- What impact on delivery/timeframes – can we do this all by the end of 2016? Is there an approach that is quicker? Does that mean we cut corners?
- Content mapping – in addition to the spreadsheet on F&S v2 page > https://victoriauniversity.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16154703
- Can we do relative sizing yet or is the approach required front?