Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Thinking about all of the above and the team members involved I propose the following Epics - story/task breakdown, at least until the high level analysis is completed. This is an approach and the start but is not yet complete.

(One task per area but spread out according to when we need them, unless this activity will influence where we start)
Epic

Story/Task

Sprint
Gain Obtain approval for launch meeting with F&S stakeholders (i.e. those most impacted, probably content owners/editors)Obtain approval for all high level scope documentsComplete initial analysis for topics identified as being on our scope boundariesHLS documents: Via PMO to give certainty Additional analysis can happen before or after.9
 Obtain approval for the horizontal and vertical scope 
 (Is there anything else PMO require to grant approval? Chrissi to add.) 
Complete all high level content audits(One task per area and probably all required prior to starting, as the outcome of this will influence where we start) 
Complete a working draft of the content strategy for all high level scope areasFinalise presentation for key stakeholders: Need a version for PMO, senior stakeholders and content owners9
 Prepare high level project plan: Showing at least the F&@S coverage over time, probably with key resources blocked in9/10
 Draft content strategies for all HLS and/or global menu areas9/10
 Initial validation of (assumed) user needs10
 Brief all senior stakeholders in F&S: MS to prepare the ground so team can meet with content owners. 
   
   
   
Agree a purpose statement and success measures for WIP II

Draft elevator pitch

 
 Draft KPIs by 
 Agree the KPIs 
Understand user and stakeholder needs(Some part of this should happen before we start the iterative agile development process, but much will happen in/during it 
Agree the high level (2 or 3 levels?) IA   
Develop familiarity with tools(Maybe each of us has a need ot be proficient with some tools in order to do our parts. Initial learnings only, as the most effective learning is just in time)   
   
   

 

Thinking about the structure going forward (as per comments from Anne Nelson (Unlicensed) in the task that led to this page I believe we are at a cross road and must decide which way to turn. The two options I see are:

  1. Epics by main activity group and stories by area of the site where that activity is required: This would give us an epic of "Content Planning" and then for each website area have a story (or more) "Plan content for Postgraduate"; or
  2. Epics by area of the website and stories by activity for that areas: This would give us an epic of "Modernised Postgraduate hub live" and stories such as "Plan content for Postgraduate hub"