Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Still a wip but enough for day 1

A few thoughts on KPIs to to start with:

  • Measures that help you understand how you are doing against your objectives.
  • Are indicators of Success
  • Can be presented through rates
  • Require comparisonRequire comparison across time periods
  • Depend on the industry and type of website

...

Based on a reading of the Business Justification Case and the scope documents (as well as listening o the team for a few weeks) I propose the following KPI's objectives (with associated benefits in brackets) and the measure (as bullet points)

...

WIP II will be successful if we :

Make greater use of the new templates

These being the same as or similar to those developed in WIP I for the home site, as they are mobile-friendly/responsive, channel-focused, use our brand consistently, ensure that all content being moved is reviewed, will support reduced duplication of content and will lower future maintenance costs). Measures include:

  • Number or percentage of old pages moved on to new templates (including those collapsed or removed altogether)
  • Number or proportion of faculties (or schools) moved on to new templates (including those collapsed or removed altogether)
  • Number of CSU sites (yet to be defined) moved on to new templates

...

Improve the ease with which students can find appropriate information and complete action while online

As this will increase the user satisfaction by ensuring that users they can better achieving achieve their intent for visiting the site. Measures include:

 

Increase online interaction (cutting cost of f2f engagement)

 

Calls to action (enrolment, contact staff, apply for scholarship) or Capture more conversion actions

 

Research more easily discoverable/accessible, especially outside of the university

 

Reduced duplication or templates and content saves money on managing and maintaining websites.

 

 

Allow items for special interest groups to be more easily gathered together

 

 

Attractive and usable

 

 

 

Suggested measure

  • Bounce rates and time

...

  • Can visitors find what they are looking for in our website or if they leave your site immediately

Conversion rates

Adopting this means:

  • You are hard core focusing on Outcomes, that's pretty serious.
  • You are going to force the conversation about Objectives, without that you don't have conversion rate!
  • Average of all sites (including ours) is low, so start with that as a base and build.
  • Will take considerable discipline/focus and iterative changes to get it to rise.
  • on site provide insight as to how well people seem to be doing what they want
  • Conversion actions, where appropriate (e.g. enrol, apply, request, book, download, call, email, etc.), are a better measure but do require more work. It shows we are focusing on outcomes and will will force the conversation to be about objectives (without these you can't have conversion rates)
    • Attention needs to accurately measure if action engagement with content downloaded (not just downloading it). In GA look at Virtual Pageviews or Events (% of video watched)
     E
    • . E.g. subscribe to updates, book/register for an event, request something mailed, enrol in a course, email/call a contact/staff member
    • Goal conversion rate is even more powerful but takes more thinking/set up.

Visitor Loyalty & Visitor Recency

  • We want people to return and do so frequently, as it builds our brand
  • f

 

Task completion rate

  • Asking people
  • Task completion rates means asking (i.e. survey based) people if they successfully completed the thing they came to doAllows . It allows for a conversation about conversion measures/actions

...

  • Percentage of site search exits

...

  • Assuming : Assuming that many visitors to our site will use the search, maybe we should examine how well it is working for people and this metric could help with that.


Increase online interaction (cutting cost of f2f engagement)

 

Research more easily discoverable/accessible, especially outside of the university

 

Reduced duplication or templates and content saves money on managing and maintaining websites.

 

Allow items for special interest groups to be more easily gathered together

 

Attractive and usable