Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Edited the key points. Have saved the former set and am putting them into a comment in case we want to revert anything back.

...

Acknowledge the lack of a voice from VBS.

 

...

 

Key points

  • Use the Vic site (and F&S) for a very limited range of tasks: info on courses, staff profiles (largely for room numbers) and shortcuts to other tools.

  • Use of F&S sites by undergrads - only for staff profiles. They aren't looking at the homepagesWebsites are not an important channel for them (especially undergrads).
  • When they use the site, it's to do a specific task - usually find a person, course info or a tool shortcut.
  • They don’t use F&S homepages and don’t see them as separate ‘sites’. They rarely use the Current students homepage, usually preferring to start from search.
  • Lack of trust in the content - perception by three students that web content may be inaccurate or out of date.
  • 'Current students' section of site - not used by current students? (Ref. analytics report below)
  • F&S pages dominating and muddling search results. 
  • Can't understand why information is spread between a 'main' site and F&S sites. Wish it was all in one place.
  • News: Even in search results slow them down and can be confusing.
  • Even the most engaged students are not interested the news F&Ss produce. They do like to hear big uni news though.
  • Course finder: Students need more detail about a course - a stronger description of what it is about. Lack of content has a very high impact on students.

 

...

 

Expectations

What were their expectations prior to coming to uni? 

...