Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

In thinking about how the analysis of subjects might apply to the content outline (and example subject page when I see it) I realised a need to write up our questions and record our conversation as we think about and lead towards a subject page proposal (which would probably be in the "Design" section of Confluence). 

 

Related subjects

  • Useful, but casts the net wide.
  • Not universally used 
  • Currently maintained by schools. Would we now get this from them and maintain it centrally?
  • Or do we want to use a recommendation engine instead?

Relationship with course

  •  Developing a mapping will be challenging, unless we base it from the subject codes used (in Banner) as the first part of the course code
  • Would this be best done with a contextual search widget (i.e. a version of course finder)? Would pick up any "known" settings (e.g. UG or PG, subject) and return a list of relevant courses. 
  • Not on current subject page. Is it required going forward?

Relationship with school

  • Usually only a link to the "taught by: school
  • I have only seen singular, but maybe there are some other (e.g. double) school relationships
  • Do we need to better understand the approval proces or threshold for a new subject (to ensure new subject pages are created as required)?
  • How do we best balance the school cf faculty relationship? Or is it okay as is?

Relationship with programme/qualification

  • Usually only a mention of the programmes that apply, not even always hyper linked.
  • Quickly gets in to programme business rules, usually assuming the subject is to be a major.

Searching for subjects

  • Using the one field “synonym” for alternative search terms, whether they be an acronym, an abbreviation, a subject code from Banner, etc)
  • Will need a “level” attribute to hold if it is available at UG, PG or both